|
|
Home Opinion
Opinion
|
Secondary Suite Legislation to be Passed 19th July: What Price Democracy |
|
|
|
|
Written by Pauline Brider
|
|
Friday, 16 July 2010 |
|
Secondary Suites
Legislation to be Passed on 19th July
What Price Democracy?
Some time ago, (October 15, 2009) in
this publication, Rafe Mair stated Peach Akerhielm "is not fit
to govern." The Councillor who made many feel ashamed to be
from Lions Bay over the ill-fated diving bylaw and towards whom many
residents fume because they have been given tickets for parking their
cars in front of their own homes, has done it again. This time, she,
along with colleagues Councillors Ronsley and Taylor, is about to
railroad her brain child secondary suites legislation into law. In
spite of calls for a more measured approach from Mayor Broughton and
for a more research and evidence-based approach by Councillor Simons,
without strong and concerted effort by this community, this bylaw
will be passed into legislation this coming Monday, 19th July and
enacted on 7th September, 2010.
If the premises on which this proposed
bylaw are based don't confound you, then the way it has been herded
through the legislative process very well may. If you are not concerned with
secondary suites legislation--fair enough. But, if you are concerned
with participatory democracy you may want to look into how this
legislation came to the point of being adopted by Council. Voices of
reason and dissent--both those within Council and those of
residents--have been consistently belittled and dismissed out of
hand. I speak from personal experience. Council Simons has been
criticized by other council members for having the temerity to
actually do her job by talking to her constituents--of whom I am
one-- eliciting their opinions, and asking them to make their
views--of whatever persuasion--known.
It has been strongly implied
that my own submission to Council is "a plant" by the
forces supporting Councillor Simons. Such a characterization can do
nothing but place doubt on the value given to this submission. If you
spoke with Councillor Simons over this issue then your views, too,
are likely to be viewed with skepticism. This is dangerous. The
implications of Ms. Akerhielm's remonstrances to Councillor Simons,
which I take very seriously, are that Councillors shall not seek the
views of those they represent, shall not represent those they are
sworn to represent, and that constituents are incapable of coming to
their own views and articulating them.
The attitude that a Councillor
not seek the opinions of his or her constituents and that those
opinions not be presented to Council has the effect of closing down
dissenting opinions, challenging freedom of expression, and
privileging the opinions of some over those of others. Taking into
account the opinions of constituents is the basis of democratic
governance as is the right to make representation to Council. To
imply otherwise, shows either blatant disregard or total ignorance of
the democratic process. I have often thought that, upon election,
officials be required to take Democracy 100 and Public Administration
100. That view has been considerably strengthened of late.
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 16 July 2010 )
|
|
|
Written by Louis Peterson
|
|
Friday, 16 July 2010 |
|
Sometimes an advertisement so captivates your eye that it makes you
think. So it was with a picture of a single small seedling, bearing
only three or four tiny leaves, with a developing root system
apparently thriving in hospitable soil. The caption read: "Your food
starts here". It was but a single tender seedling, not a field, not a
vast prairie, not an extensive productive farmland - just one solitary,
lonely seedling. But wait, surely the seed came first?
Leaving aside the puzzle of "Who or what came first?", we soon realize
that there are many players who provide food for our table. Out crops
are part of the great plant kingdom. They need sunshine, water, carbon
dioxide, other nutrients, and a sustaining soil medium replete with
beneficial bacteria in which to grow. Toxic substances, whether natural
or man imposed, need to be absent. The grains give us our daily bread.
In the animal domain, the herbivores graze on nature's providence, the
carnivores eat the herbivores, and we eat the beneficence of both of
them for our food.
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 16 July 2010 )
|
|
|
Written by James Nelson
|
|
Wednesday, 07 July 2010 |
|
Today I erected a clothes line. I realize it is against some bylaw but happily the bylaw doesn't apply to me. After 20+ years I am no longer a villager. I can have a clothes line. Sustainable, green, environmentally friendly. James Nelson
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 July 2010 )
|
|
|
Written by cheryl wozny
|
|
Friday, 02 July 2010 |
|
Let’s tip the hat (if we have one) to Mr. Gershwin:
Summer time an’ the livin’ is easy,
Fish are jumpin’ an’ the cotton is high.
Fish are out there on the Sound, the bald eagle is hovering over Brunswick Beach; not sure about the cotton. In any event, it’s summer, a little late arriving; but for one and all, it’s time to go easy on the rules which by necessity, whether applied with discretion or enforced boot camp style, each household has them to prevent descent into borderline chaos.
For the younger folk it’s the end of school and the morning’s parental screaming to get out of bed, a well-earned respite from disciplined homework, the evening meal and bed later than usual; and heaven! sleeping in! For more mature members, vows to get in better shape so life at this time of the year can be more enjoyable and promises made, hopefully to be fulfilled, of a thousand household projects from fixing the unruly backyard to reading unread books gathering dust on the shelves. Perhaps even re-create the spark in your love life.
Rules? They are always out there, in some form or other, but make them a more balanced ingredient in your life in this beautiful time of the year. It is the season for fun. Indulge yourself.
It’s summer. An’ the livin’ is easy.
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 02 July 2010 )
|
|
|
Written by Philip Bromiley
|
|
Thursday, 01 July 2010 |
|
RE : Proposed By law Change regarding secondary suites.
The councilors are explaining in their update email it was determined in the OCP. that suites should pay a fair contribution for the extra services which they use. fair when it comes to services, what about people who use very little water, and those who only have one garbage can per week, are you also intending to make their contribution fair? Whilst I agree that everything should be
What exactly are these extra service costs in Real Dollars that Basement Suites create, do you have any actual statistics from Lions Bay to prove that suites are using more water, and producing more garbage, or are you just making that assumption? There are many people who have 4 or more children who use far more water, and create far more garbage than some of the basement suites.What is wrong with paying for the number of cans you put out, by having a permanent, one time only, pre- numbered and assigned, hard plastic tag, attached to each handle. Just like parking permits are issued once a year, homeowners can then pay for the extra service that they need, by purchasing extra tags. Suites would need the extra tags, and so would the other residents who create more garbage.
A new survey of each home with no. and age of people occupying could result in the approx calculation of the amount of the water usage charge and also provide the no. and age of people residing in each dwelling in case of emergency, re: fire and earthquake. Age statistics would also provide the means to survey the older generation just to see how many older people are really interested in AGE FRIENDLY dwellings. Personally I do not think water is a problem, as long as it keeps coming down the creek, the next thing will be you charging for, will be people who leave hoses running and washing cars too much! or heaven forbid putting in water meters!
The solutions discussed above would not require the need to Legalize suites or create a billing system to charge for extra services or require the need to hire more office staff, it would also ensure that residents only use CANS and not plastic bags, like many still do, and would be a much fairer way to charge everyone than what you are proposing. I am not in favor of charging a set fee for services for suites, and neither am I concerned as to what the larger Municipalities charge, as we are a small community and we do not necessarily need to follow like sheep. Personally, I am content to see things left the way they are, rather than put any more work on the Administrative staff in the office. The wheel is not broke, why fix it? Regards, Philip Bromiley
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 01 July 2010 )
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 9 of 132 |
|
Calendar
 |
July 2010 |
 |
|
Business Directory Ad
|